I have related the sad but not unusual case story of Gene in Part 1 of this three-part article. What had happened to Gene is what I have been looking happen all too often. After chemotherapy and radiotherapy the cancer spread to the bone. I have often wondered if the treatments had whatever to do with the metastasis. Not much information can be obtained from the curative literature. It appears that such quiz, is not important? Or is it a matter of "natural procedure of event"? I tend to think otherwise.
What I said. It is not outcome that the actual about Radiation Therapist Schools. You look at this article for home elevators a person wish to know is Radiation Therapist Schools.How is Breast Cancer - Radiation-induced Agony and Metastases - Part 2
We had a good read. For the benefit of yourself. Be sure to read to the end. I want you to get good knowledge from Radiation Therapist Schools.Read about radiotherapy in any proper textbook and it is acknowledged that radiation itself can cause cancer. In Gene's case, it is even acknowledged that the increased uptake of tracer seen in L3, L4 and L5 vertebrae is most likely due to Dxt. curative population use curative terms that may be hard for a layperson to understand. So the information written in a curative report often goes unnoticed or not understood. Dxt is curative abbreviation for deep X-ray treatment or radiotherapy and this statement above explicitly implicates the disastrous role of radiotherapy in treating Gene's breast cancer. It has done much harm.
Are we to believe that Gene is just one rare unfortunate victim. I don't believe that this is so.
Dr. Richard Evans (in The Cancer Breakthrough You've Never Heard Of) wrote: "It is my belief that adjuvant radiation is used more often than vital ... The long-term risks of radiation therapy have not been completely determined." John Robbins has to say in his book (Reclaiming Our Health) "Radiation is routinely recommended for cancer patients despite the fact that there is no proven benefit to survival ... Although cancer specialists know that very few cancer patients are cured by radiotherapy, they continue to advise it widely because they consider it to be a relatively harmless procedure."
In the booklet, Radiation Therapy and You, published by the Us National Cancer Institute, the following assurances are given: "Although some normal cells are affected by the radiation, most of them appear to recover more fully from the effects of radiation than the cancer cells. Doctors thought about limit the intensity of the treatment and the area being treated so that the cancer will be affected more than the normal healthy tissues. Radiation therapy is an productive way to treat many kinds of cancer in any part of the body."
This is the valid version of the "goodness" of radiotherapy. Do you believe it? Hear what other doctors have to say about radiotherapy.
John Cairns, a professor at the Harvard University School of social health (in Scientific American, November 1985) said: "The majority of cancers cannot be cured by radiation because the dose of X-rays required to kill the cancer cells would also kill the patient." John Lee et. Al. (in What Your doctor May Not Tell You About Breast Cancer) wrote: "Radiation reduces (breast cancer) death by 13.2 percent, it increases death from other causes, mostly heart disease by 21.2 percent. The inescapable windup is: the treatment was a success but the patient died!"
Dr. Seymour Brenner, a radiologist from Brooklyn, New York, said: "After thirty-nine years, I have see no vital improve ... I see millions of population dying in five years ... I am tired of watching population come to my office and plead for their lives and I have nothing to offer them.
Dr. Ralph Moss (in The Cancer Industry) wrote: "Radiation therapy appears to be of microscopic value in the treatment of cancer. There is microscopic controversy over the amount of patients being cured by radiotherapy - it is small ... Some researchers believe that the use of radiation is not only ineffective but also is perhaps harmful ... It is part of a disastrous national procedure that has always downplayed the hazards of radiation, while promoting its spread to every projection of the country.
Dr. Francisco Contreras, director of the Oasis of Hope Hospital described radiation as an act of desperation. In his book, health in the 21st Century: Will Doctors Survive? he wrote: "Radiation therapy, in which we settled so much faith a few decades ago, has proven to be an additional one curative blunder. My brother, Dr. Ernesto Contreras Jr., an oncologist and radio-therapist said, after twenty-five years of curative practice, "It is for real frustrating ... The effectiveness of the treatment against cancer is doubtful. I have treated thousands of patients ... And I can't say that more than fifteen percent of them have inescapable response to an orthodox treatment."
I hope you will get new knowledge about Radiation Therapist Schools. Where you possibly can put to used in your everyday life. And most significantly, your reaction is Radiation Therapist Schools.Read more.. see Breast Cancer - Radiation-induced Agony and Metastases - Part 2. View Related articles related to Radiation Therapist Schools. I Roll below. I actually have suggested my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Breast Cancer - Radiation-induced Agony and Metastases - Part 2.
0 comments:
Post a Comment